“You’re nervous when there’s no bike lanes. At least I was. We have to do everything we can to make sure three’s never a death in the city. One death is way too many when it comes to bicycle riders.
Fast forward to September 2024, and Premier Ford has launched an us vs them campaign against people on bikes across the province, particularly aimed at his perceived fiefdom Etobicoke/Bloor West. What’s changed? Aside from conditions supporting the need for more bike lanes; namely a climate emergency, high cost of living, congestion, etc., growing each day, maybe it’s a government tired of being bit by corruption scandal after corruption scandal. A government without real ideas to combat ER wait times, a faltering education system and of course wild gridlock across the GTHA.
Culture War
We submit that instead of addressing real provincial concerns, the Premier and his team (who are incredibly adept at deflection and speaking to his perceived bases of support) are using bike lanes to divide road users and hit home talking points that they know play with suburban voters they are trying to pry away from Bonnie Crombie. It’s easier to rile those folks up about a hot topic (but comparable non-issue) than address the crippling congestion those same voters face on the 401. Of course, beyond offering them a tunnel (which as soon as the media allure ran out around that Ford was back to bashing bike lanes).
Despite Ford’s repeated anti-bike lane rants, CBC and others have done a fantastic job fact checking the Premier and his cronies’ claims against bike lanes:
EMS vehicles are not delayed by bike lanes in getting folks to emergency rooms as confirmed by the City of Toronto’s EMS leads.
There is not a petition of 50,000 people against the bike lanes on Bloor. It’s more like 13,000 who’ve signed over several years now and Cycle Toronto’s petition in support of bike lanes is approaching that number in just weeks.
Bike lanes are good for business! They boost sales in areas they are installed, attract higher spending clientele, can increase property values, and even attract talented work forces.
Bike lanes do not increase congestion, they move people around more efficiently, create safer driving routes (less collisions, less congestion), and get people out of single occupancy motor vehicle, which actually are the cause of congestion.
Side streets are not the answer. Unconnected segments of bike lanes that force cyclists to take circuitous routes on various side streets will not encourage people to get out of their cars and onto bikes;
Though facts should prevail, as lawyers for injured cyclists across Ontario, we are deeply concerned about the Premier and Ontario PC government’s floated plans to attack people on bikes through legislation halting bike lane development.
As people on bikes this year have been killed in staggering numbers, it seems odd and we suspect painful for the loved ones of those lost, to hear of plans to decrease cyclist safety rather than plans from the government to increase penalties for those that kill and maim on our roads [Vulnerable Road User Legislation].
In just one month’s time, we have seen cyclists killed in Belleville, Toronto, Guelph, Elora area, and Niagara. This is to say nothing of the many pedestrians and motorist killed and injured across the province each week.
Why then attack bike lanes and the Ontarians that use them? The Premier himself when on a bicycle confirmed how much safer he felt in a bike lane [TVO Blind Date segment w Jagmeet Singh].
Sadly, it’s not just the Premier, his Ministers of Transportation and Sport have begun attacking bike lanes for political gain too.
In September, on Rowan’s Law Day, a day to raise awareness of concussions, Minister of Sport Neil Lumsden when asked whether he should for the sake of preventing head injuries tell his government to build more bike lanes, said rather that cyclists should use helmets and common sense (as reported by Émilie Gougeon-Pelletier).
Reporter: Wouldn’t you agree barriers around bike lanes prevent brain injuries?
Minister of Sport: That’s an assumption.
Reporter: If there aren’t no bike lane barriers brain injuries won’t go up?
Minister of Sport: I haven’t got the science to back that statement up.
Minister Lumsden had the audacity to say this in front of his co-presenter Eric Lindros, who’s remarkable hockey career was cut short due to concussions he sustained, while being a helmeted hockey player.
As lawyers for a terrifying number of cyclists with head injuries, including concussions, we know that bike helmets are not designed for impacts with motor vehicles.
Transportation Minister Prabmeet Sarkaria wrote a piddling opinion piece in the Toronto Star about congestion and how his government’s grand solution was opposing bike lanes.
Minister Sarkaria admitted in his “opinion piece” that he gets in his (single occupancy) car in Brampton and then faces traffic all the way to Queen’s Park. Instead of addressing the congestion along the 2-3 400 series highways he takes into work, he goes after bike lane development on Avenue Road…where 3 cyclists have been killed due in part to the lack of safe infrastructure on that major throughway for Torontonians.
Minister Sarkaria doesn’t say why he chooses to drive instead of taking the GO and TTC. Perhaps most poignantly put by Greg Lehman on X:
Dude from Brampton wants to tell Torontonians how to create our streets. He doesn’t contribute to our municipal tax base. Not sure why he gets a say. He is the traffic problem.
Ontarians must see these bike lane attacks for what they are. A tool to distract us from the real problems pressing this province. Congestion is a very real and very costly concern for the GTHA, but not permitting a bike lane on the 401 isn’t going to ease the flow of traffic there. Even in Toronto, most will recognize that it is the sheer number of cars on the roads, ok, and maybe the baffling number of construction projects, that are actually creating gridlock.
In many of our cases, incidents of serious collision and injury, even death, could have been avoided with safe protected infrastructure. There can be no reasonable, factual, or statistical justification for impeding the provision of safe infrastructure. There are no studies to show bike lanes cause traffic. There are studies that show they keep people safe, and alive.
We do know that safe infrastructure, like bike lanes, is critical to remove conflict and collision points between road users.
Just like health care, education, housing and the environment, and now road safety (yes we are in a road safety crisis), we recognize it is easier to use divisive issues like bike lanes to wedge people apart. It is easier to distract voters from government corruption allegations and investigations. It is easier to distract than to take bold steps to address issues of great concern and profound impact on our society.
However, we must demand more from our elected officials and hold them to account when they fail to address the many pressing issues of concern for Ontarians.
Join your local cycling advocacy group and encourage your municipal leaders in towns and cities across Ontario to oppose Doug Ford’s upcoming legislation.
Sign the Cycle Toronto petition in support of bike lanes province wide.
Strength in numbers, so please raise your voice friends.
#thebikinglawyer #thecyclinglawyer #cyclinglaw #cyclinglawyer #bikelawyer not a #bikeaccident #bikecrash #carcrash #ontario #hamilton #toronto #london #ottawa #kitchener #windsor #waterloo #guelph #backonthebike #backontrack #insurance #bikeinsurance #ridesafe #rulesoftheroad #safestreets #ridetogether bike accident lawyer